April 2019 Recap



On April 27, 2019, USAC released its first wave of FY2019 Funding Commitment Decision Letters.  This wave contains funding decisions on more than 18,500 applications and more than 24,000 of the Funding Request Numbers (FRNs) featured in those applications.  More than half of the applications that were filed in the window received a funding commitment decision from USAC within 30 days of the window close.  As of April 27, the FY2019 commitments total more than $530 million.

USAC is required to file an annual report with Congress and the FCC by March 31, to provide a summary of USAC’s operations, activities, and accomplishments of the prior year.  Highlights from the 2018 Annual Report include:

Disbursements for USF programs increased in 2018:  USAC collected more than $8 billion from contributions to support the four USF sub-programs in FY2018.  The increase in disbursements resulted from:
  • The High Cost Program increased disbursements to support hurricane relief efforts in Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands.
  • FCC’s March 2018 high cost order provided $180 million in one-time funding.  The high cost programs disbursed a total of $4.8 billion in 2018.
  • The RHC Program funding cap increased from $400 million to $571 million. 
E-rate and Lifeline program disbursements did not experience significant changes in FY2018.

Rural Health Care Program 2018 Highlights:


  • Total gross demand increased 17.4 percent from FY2017.
  • USAC cleared four times more appeals in 2018 compared to 2017 but did not say how many appeals were cleared. 
  • USAC implemented program changes from the FCC’s 2018 Funding Cap Order.  The Order increased the funding cap to $571 million and added annual adjustments for inflation. The increased funding was applied and distributed to previously prorated FY2017 commitments.  Additionally, the Order allowed unused funds to be carried-forward for use in future funding years.  

E-rate Program 2018 Highlights:


  • Received 35,000 applications for $2.77 billion.  Issued decisions for 43 percent of applications within 30 days of the filing window closing.  USAC also noted it had committed $1 billion for 18,000 applications by the beginning of June.  
  • Average review time for appeals is currently under 75 days.
  • New vendor took over call center operations on June 1, 2018.  USAC’s move to two consolidated program call centers resulted in $2 million in cost savings annually.
  • The transition of Business Processing Operations vendors, from Solix to Maximus, resulted in $65 million in savings over the next 5 years.


Read the USAC 2018 Annual Report here.  Annual reports for prior years are available here.


On April 1, 2019, USAC estimated the demand for E-rate services at $2.896 billion for Funding Year 2019.  This estimate includes $1.91 billion for Category 1 services and $985 million for Category 2 services.  USAC calcuated this estimate based on the total amount of funding requested in Form 471 applications received by the close of the FY2019 filing window.  Nearly 36,000 applications were submitted in window.  Applications filed within two weeks of the deadline but that will likely be granted a waiver were not included in the report.

A table showing estimated demand by service type and discount band is available here.  Nearly 46 percent of the C1 requests were made by applicants in the 90% and higher discount category. 


USAC filed its Semi-Annual Audit Report with the Commission on April 1, 2019.  The report summarized outstanding audit findings as of February 28, 2019.  The report noted that there were:
  • 21 beneficiary audits older than six months with a potential recovery of $15.6 million.  The recovery process is underway, but notification letters have not been issued for these audits.
  • 14 beneficiary audits held in abeyance because an appeal of USAC’s recovery determination is pending with USAC.  The potential recovery is $6.5 million.
  • 73 beneficiary audits held in abeyance because an appeal or waiver of USAC’s recovery determination is pending with the FCC.  The potential recovery is $19.6 million.
  • 39 audits without payment or a satisfactory arrangement for payment of debt.  To date, USAC has transferred $10.3 million to the Treasury Department related to these audits.

On March 26, 2019, Chairman Pai circulated an NPRM seeking comment on a funding cap for the entire USF program.  It has been reported that the NPRM does not propose any cuts or reach a tentative conclusion in favor of a USF cap but is simply seeking comment on such a proposal.  The NPRM is not public because it is not scheduled to be considered at a Commission agenda meeting.

Commissioner O’Rielly wrote a blog post on April 2 in support of an overall cap on the USF. O’Rielly asserted a cap is crucial because the Commission has repeatedly raised the budgets of the four USF sub-programs without offsetting spending elsewhere.  A cap would force the Commission to carefully consider the cost-effectiveness and consequences of raising a USF program’s budget on the entire USF, he said.  O’Rielly argued that adopting a cap would not preclude the Commission from voting to raise the cap in the future, but it would force the Commission to carefully consider such increases.  O’Rielly also pointed out that the NPRM’s proposed budgetary cap of $11.42 billion is well-above current disbursement levels, leaving a $2 billion cushion for future increases. 

In response, opponents criticized the proposed USF cap arguing it will increase the digital divide and harm consumers.   

At this point, the NPRM has not been made public.  A public draft will be released if the NPRM is placed on the Commission’s monthly agenda for a vote.  The NPRM must receive three votes to be approved and released.  Even after the NPRM’s adoption, any process to establish a cap would take time.  The Commission is required to solicit and accept public comments on the proposed rule before adopting a final, new rule.



E-rate Amortization NPRM Comments due Mid-March


The E-rate amortization NPRM has been published in the Federal Register setting the comment cycle.  Comments are due March 18 and replies are due April 1.  

In the order released with the NPRM, the Commission extended the suspension of the amortization rule through the duration of the rulemaking.  In the NPRM, the Commission sought comment on eliminating the rule.  Prior to FY 2015, a Commission decision in 2000 had limited E-rate’s use for this purpose by requiring schools and libraries to amortize over three years upfront, non-recurring charges of $500,000 or more, including charges for special construction projects. 

Farmington special construction appeal granted


Last Friday, the Wireline Competition Bureau granted an appeal of a special construction denial filed by Farmington School District in New Mexico.  I represented the school district on its appeal to the Commission.

The application was denied because USAC found that Farmington considered the state match in its cost-effectiveness analysis.  In its appeal, Farmington demonstrated that it did not consider the state match when evaluating the bids and selecting a self-provisioned network as the most cost-effective.  Farmington received a bid for a self-provisioned network and a bid for a leased dark fiber network.  The leased dark fiber project was less expensive but did not win the bid on overall points.  The bidding evaluation matrix showed that the self-provisioned project bidder, while receiving the most overall points, had been awarded fewer points in the cost category, consistent with the pre-discount costs of the services.  If Farmington had considered the state match as part of its evaluation and the fact that the district would have had lower out-of-pocket costs with the self-provisioned project, that bidder would have received the most points for cost.  WCB therefore found that Farmington complied with the Commission’s competitive bidding rules.

Click here to see the full order.

FCC Proposes Cap Increase for RHC


On June 6, 2018, Chairman Pai announced that he is circulating a draft order that would increase the current $400 million cap for the Universal Service Fund's Rural Healthcare Program.  The News Release can be viewed here.  Chairman Pai has proposed to increase the cap to $571 million, the amount the cap would be if it had been indexed to inflation since the program’s inception.  If adopted, the order could eliminate the need to prorate the 2017 funding requests because the demand exceeded the cap.  The five FCC commissioners will have to vote on the draft order but they can do that at any time; they do not have to wait for the next Commission meeting in July.

FCC Proposes to Restrict USF funds in the Interest of National Security



The Commission today released its NPRM seeking comment on whether the Commission should prohibit Universal Service Funds (USF) from being used to purchase any equipment or services by any company posing national security threat to the integrity of communications networks.  The NPRM was adopted at the Commission’s meeting yesterday.  The comment cycle will be set when the NPRM is published in the Federal Register.
Commissioner's Statements:
Chairman Pai
Clyburn
O'Rielly
Carr
 

Let me know if you are interested in further information or have any questions.

FCC Announces 2Q USF Contribution Factor


On March 9, 2018, the FCC released a Public Notice that the proposed universal service contribution factor for the second quarter of 2018 will be 0.184 or 18.4%.  USAC projected demand and expenses for the second quarter of 2018 to be $1.9 million.

The full text may be viewed here.

Share this page:

The Insights Blog