Comments on Status of the Universal Service Fund Requested by Congress Due August 25
On July 28, 2023, Sens. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and John Thune (R-S.D.), co-chairs of the Universal Service Fund (USF) Working Group, announced that the public can submit comments to the working group on the following USF questions:
1. How should Congress and the Commission evaluate the effectiveness of the existing USF programs in achieving universal service goals for broadband?
2. To what extent have the existing USF programs been effective in carrying out section 254 of the Communications Act of 1994 and has the Commission adequately evaluated the effectiveness of each program against concrete goals and metrics?
3. Is the FCC’s administration of the USF and its four programs sufficiently transparent and accountable? If not, what reforms are necessary and appropriate within the four existing USF programs to improve transparency, accountability, and cost-effectiveness, and does the Commission have the authority to make such reforms?
4. What reforms are necessary to address inefficiencies and waste, fraud, and abuse in each of the four programs and duplication with other government programs?
5. What additional policies beyond existing programs are necessary for the preservation and advancement of universal service?
6. Should Congress eliminate the requirement that a provider must be an “Eligible Telecommunications Carrier” to receive USF subsidies?
7. Currently, telecommunications companies must pay a contribution factor to the Universal Service Fund proportional to interstate end-user revenues. What reforms are necessary to ensure that the contribution factor is sufficient to preserve and advance universal service?
a. Some have advocated for assessing USF contributions on broadband service and edge providers. What would the impact of such reforms on ratepayers and the marketplace?
b. Some have advocated the funding for the USF to an appropriations model. What impact would that have the USF?
8. What actions are necessary and appropriate to improve coordination between USF programs and other programs at the Federal Communications Commission, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, USDA Rural Development, the Department of Treasury, and other federal agencies?
9. Is the USF administrator, USAC, sufficiently accountable and transparent? Is USAC’s role in need of reform?
10. Is Congressional guidance needed to ensure future high-cost program rollouts, such as RDOF phase II, are improved? Would a thorough and upfront vetting process be more efficient for federal dollars and recipient ISPs?
Public comments are due by Aug. 25, 2023. The form to submit comments can be found here.
